insync.com.ua is the first site to go through our GEO framework. A technical audit of 100/100, and in a clean session ChatGPT already quotes our positioning verbatim — citing “InSync Agency” as the source. Below are real numbers you can replicate on your own site.
This isn't a render or an edit. In a “clean” ChatGPT session (Temporary Chat, no history or cookies), when you ask about InSync, the model quotes the positioning from our site and marks the source as “InSync Agency.” That's how a GEO framework works: the site becomes what AI reads and repeats.
We ran sites from our working niches through the scanner. The average business site scores 15–30 out of 100 — AI models barely see it and recommend whoever they can see instead.
Each factor is a specific reason why ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Gemini will either quote a business or stay silent about it.
A “passport” for AI models: services, pricing, case studies, geography — in a format the LLM reads first.
GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, and 7 more bots are explicitly allowed to index and cite.
6 types of markup: Organization, Person, Service, FAQPage, Breadcrumb, ContactPoint — machine-readable facts.
28 pages in the sitemap: services, niches, comparisons, blog — everything crawlers need to find.
Question-and-answer is the LLM's favorite format for citation. On every key page.
Unique descriptions on every page — engines pull answer snippets from them.
Accessibility and speed: a crawler that doesn't get a response in time won't cite anything.
Headlines built around real niche questions, not “Home — Company N.”
A 100/100 technical framework is readiness. What decides things next are mentions in AI answers. Here's our honest baseline at the start and an open plan: we document our own before/after every month. No one else on the market shows you the score this transparently.
We don't sell "faith" in a single score. Every month — three independent layers, each with a screenshot and an export. No number taken on faith.
Visits from chatgpt.com, perplexity.ai, gemini.google.com, copilot — the "AI Sources" segment in your GA4. Proves: real people came from AI answers.
GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, OAI-SearchBot from server logs. Proves: AI models are physically reading the site and updating what they know about it.
20 control queries for the niche × 4 engines: whether the client is mentioned, who's mentioned instead, month-over-month dynamics against competitors.
To be honest: 100/100 means technical readiness for AI search, not "#1 in ChatGPT." Mentions build up over 2–3 months through content and external sources. Anyone promising guaranteed rankings in ChatGPT is lying. What we guarantee is a system of work and a transparent measurement — including our own, published openly.
The same scanner we used to check ourselves: 8 AI visibility factors, a /100 score, and a list of exactly what to fix. Free, no sign-up, right here — 60 seconds.
The score is a diagnosis, not a prescription. Leave your contact and we'll send you a breakdown of your specific case — what to fix first, what it'll get you in your niche, and how much it costs to close the gap.